Aposematismo: Diferenzas entre revisións

ThereHai isprobas evidenceque forapoian explanationsas involvingexplicacións dietaryque conservatismimplican a conservaciinismo dietario, inno whichcal predatorsos avoidpredadores newevitan preynovas becausepresas itporque isé anunha unknowncantidade quantitydescoñecida;<ref name=thomas2003>{{cite journal |last=Thomas |first=R. J. |last2=Marples |first2=N. M. |last3=Cuthill |first3=I. C. |last4=Takahashi |first4=M. |last5=Gibson |first5=E. A. |year=2003 |title=Dietary conservatism may facilitate the initial evolution of aposematism |journal=Oikos |volume=101 |issue=3 |pages=548–566 |doi=10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12061.x }}</ref> thiseste isé aun long-lastingefecto de longa effectduración.<ref name=thomas2003/><ref name=marples2005>{{cite journal |last=Marples |first=Nicola M. |last2=Kelly |first2=David J. |last3=Thomas |first3=Robert J. |year=2005 |title=Perspective: The evolution of warning coloration is not paradoxical |journal=Evolution |volume=59 |issue=5 |pages=933–940 |doi=10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01032.x |pmid=16136793}}</ref><ref name=lindstrom2001>{{cite journal |last=Lindstrom |first=Leena |last2=Altalo |first2=Rauno V. |last3=Lyytinen |first3=Anne |last4=Mappes |first4=Johanna |year=2001 |title=Predator experience on cryptic prey affects the survival of conspicuous aposematic prey |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society |volume=268 |issue=1465 |pages=357–361 |doi=10.1098/rspb.2000.1377 }}</ref> DietaryO conservatismconservacionismo hasdietario beenfoi demonstrateddemostrado experimentallyexperimentalmente innalgunhas someespecies species ofde birdspaxaros.<ref name=thomas2003/><ref name=lindstrom2001/>

FurtherAdemais, birdsos recallpaxaros andlembran avoide objectsevitan thatobxectos areque bothson conspicuousrechamantes ande foul-tastingde longermal thansabor objectsdurante thatun aretempo equallymáis foul-tastingprolongado butque crypticallyobxectos colouredque son igualmente de mal sabor pero de coloración [[cripse|críptica]]. ThisIsto suggestssuxire thatque a idea orixinal de Wallace's originalde view,que thata warningcoloración colourationde helpedadvertencia toaxudaba teacha predatorsensinar toaos avoidpredadores preya thusevitar coloureda presa así coloreada, wasera correctcorrecta.<ref name=Roper1987>{{cite book|last=Roper|first=Tim J.|title=New Scientist|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Kc5qky1dIkIC&pg=PA51|date=9 July 1987|publisher=Reed Business Information|pages=50–52|issn=0262-4079}}</ref> HoweverPorén, somealgunhas birdsaves (inexperiencedestorniños starlingsinexpertos ande domesticpolos chicksdomésticos) alsotamén evitan de maneira [[innateinnata]]ly avoidos obxectos conspicuouslyde colouredcores objectsrechamantes, ascomo demonstratedse usingdemostrou mealwormsusando paintedlarvas yellowdo andescaravello black''[[Tenebrio tomolitor]]'' resemblepintadas waspsde amarelo e negro para que lembrasen avespas, withcon exemplares de dullcontrol greenverdes controlsapagados. ThisIsto impliesimplica thatque warninga colorationcoloración worksde atadvertencia leastfunciona inpolo partmenos byen stimulatingparte theestimulando evolutiona ofevolución predatorsdos topredadores encodepara thecodificar meaningo ofsignificado thedo warningsinal signalde advertencia, ratheren thanvez byde requiringque eachsexa newnecesario generationque tocada learnnova thexeración signal'saprenda o significado do meaningsinal.<ref name=Roper1987/>

AllTodos ofestes theseresultados resultscontradín contradict thea idea thatde que é novel,máis brightlyprobqable colouredque individualsos wouldnovos beindividuos morecon likelyvivas tocores besexan eatencomidos orou attackedatacados bypolos predatorspredadores.<ref name="thomas2003"/>