Liberdade de expresión: Diferenzas entre revisións
Contido eliminado Contido engadido
Sen resumo de edición |
|||
Liña 1:
{{Enuso}}
[[Ficheiro:EleanorRooseveltHumanRights.png|miniatura|[[Eleanor Roosevelt]] e a Declaración Universal dos Dereitos Humanos (1948). O artigo XIX estabelece que "todo ser humano ten dereito á liberdade de opinión e expresión".]]
'''Liberdade de expresión''' é o [[dereito]] de calquera individuo a manifestar, [[Liberdade|libremente]], opinións, ideas e pensamentos persoais sen medo de represión ou censura por parte do goberno ou doutros membros da sociedade.<ref name="Mill 1859 1-5"
<ref name="Mill 1859 2-19">{{cite book |title=On Liberty |last=Mill |first=John Stuart |date=1859 |publication-date=1869 |location=London |publisher=Longman, Roberts & Green |edition=4th |at=para. 19 |url=http://www.bartleby.com/130/ |chapter=Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion|chapter-url=http://www.bartleby.com/130/2.html |quote="In respect to all persons but those whose pecuniary circumstances make them independent of the good will of other people, opinion, on this subject, is as efficacious as law; men might as well be imprisoned, as excluded from the means of earning their bread."}}</ref>▼
<ref name="Ten Cate 2010">{{cite journal |last=Ten Cate |first=Irene M. |date=2010 |title=Speech, Truth, and Freedom: An Examination of John Stuart Mill's and Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes's Free Speech Defenses |url=http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlh/vol22/iss1/2 |journal=Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities |volume=22 |issue=1 |at=Article 2 |quote="[A] central argument for freedom of speech in On Liberty is that in order to maximize the benefits a society can gain ... it must permanently commit to restraining dominant groups from their natural inclination to demand conformity."}}</ref>▼
<ref name="Wragg 2015">{{cite journal |last=Wragg |first=Paul |date=2015 |title=Free Speech Rights at Work: Resolving the Differences between Practice and Liberal Principle |journal=Industrial Law Journal |publisher=Oxford University Press |volume=44 |issue=1 |page=11 |url=http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/content/44/1/1.full.pdf |subscription=yes |quote="Comparison may be made between Mill's ‘tyrannical majority’ and the employer who dismisses an employee for expression that it dislikes on moral grounds. The protection of employer action in these circumstances evokes Mill's concern about state tolerance of coercive means to ensure conformity with orthodox moral viewpoints and so nullify unorthodox ones."}}</ref> É un concepto fundamental nas [[democracia]]s modernas nas cales a [[censura]] non ten apoio moral.<ref>CABRAL, Bruno Fontenele. “Freedom of speech”. Consideracións sobre a liberdade de expresión e de imprenta no dereito norteamericano. Jus Navigandi, Teresina, ano 15, n. 2640, 23 set. 2010. Dispoñíbel en: <http://jus.com.br/artigos/17476>. Acesso o: 16 ago. 2013.</ref> A liberdade de expresión é un dereito humano, protexido pola Declaración Universal dos [[Dereitos humanos|Dereitos Humanos]], de 1948, e polas constitucións de varios países democráticos.<ref>{{Cita web|título = Concepto de liberdade de expresión — Conceito.de|URL = http://conceito.de/liberdade-de-expressao|obra = Conceito.de|dataacceso = 8 de outubro de 2015}}</ref>▼
== Historia ==
Liña 24 ⟶ 27:
== Notas ==
{{Listaref}}
▲<ref name="Mill 1859 2-19">{{cite book |title=On Liberty |last=Mill |first=John Stuart |date=1859 |publication-date=1869 |location=London |publisher=Longman, Roberts & Green |edition=4th |at=para. 19 |url=http://www.bartleby.com/130/ |chapter=Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion|chapter-url=http://www.bartleby.com/130/2.html |quote="In respect to all persons but those whose pecuniary circumstances make them independent of the good will of other people, opinion, on this subject, is as efficacious as law; men might as well be imprisoned, as excluded from the means of earning their bread."}}</ref>
▲<ref name="Ten Cate 2010">{{cite journal |last=Ten Cate |first=Irene M. |date=2010 |title=Speech, Truth, and Freedom: An Examination of John Stuart Mill's and Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes's Free Speech Defenses |url=http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlh/vol22/iss1/2 |journal=Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities |volume=22 |issue=1 |at=Article 2 |quote="[A] central argument for freedom of speech in On Liberty is that in order to maximize the benefits a society can gain ... it must permanently commit to restraining dominant groups from their natural inclination to demand conformity."}}</ref>
▲<ref name="Wragg 2015">{{cite journal |last=Wragg |first=Paul |date=2015 |title=Free Speech Rights at Work: Resolving the Differences between Practice and Liberal Principle |journal=Industrial Law Journal |publisher=Oxford University Press |volume=44 |issue=1 |page=11 |url=http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/content/44/1/1.full.pdf |subscription=yes |quote="Comparison may be made between Mill's ‘tyrannical majority’ and the employer who dismisses an employee for expression that it dislikes on moral grounds. The protection of employer action in these circumstances evokes Mill's concern about state tolerance of coercive means to ensure conformity with orthodox moral viewpoints and so nullify unorthodox ones."}}</ref>
{{Control de autoridades}}
| |||