Wikipedia:O que a Wikipedia non é: Diferenzas entre revisións
Contido eliminado Contido engadido
Liña 101:
# Aínda que existen paradigmas científicos que poden ser rexeitados posteriormente, e hipóteses previamente controvertidas ou ás veces incorrectas que remataron por ser aceptadas pola comunidade científica, a Wikipedia non é o lugar para aventurar este tipo de proxeccións.
# '''A Wikipedia non é unha colección de anuncios e rumores sobre produtos.''' Aínda que a Wikipedia inclúe información actualizada sobre produtos novidosos, os artigos que só conteñen información promocional dun produto non son axeitados. Ata que se poda recompilar información máis enciclopédica sobre un determinado produto que sexa verificable, a información sobre estes debe fusionarse nunha temática maior (coma por exemplo o artigo sobre o creador ou creadores, unha serie de produtos ou un produto previo) se é posible.
===A Wikipedia non é un xornal===
{{Atallo|WP:NON#XORNAL}}
{{Anchor|XORNAL}}
<!-- As Wikipedia is not a paper source, editors are encouraged to include current and up-to-date information within its coverage, and to develop stand-alone articles on significant current events. However, not all verifiable events are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Ensure that Wikipedia articles are not:
# '''Original reporting.'''{{anchor|ORIGINALREPORTING}} Wikipedia should not offer first-hand news reports on breaking stories. Wikipedia does not constitute a [[WP:PRIMARY|primary source]]. However, our sister projects [[Wikisource]] and [[Wikinews]] do exactly that, and ''are'' intended to be primary sources. Wikipedia does have many ''encyclopedia articles'' on topics of historical significance that are currently in the news, and can be updated with recently [[WP:V|verified]] information.
# '''News reports.'''{{anchor|NEWSREPORTS}} Wikipedia considers the enduring [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability]] of persons and events. While news coverage can be useful source material for encyclopedic topics, most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion. For example, routine news reporting on things like announcements, sports, or celebrities is not a sufficient basis for inclusion in the encyclopedia. While including information on recent developments is sometimes appropriate, breaking news should not be emphasized or otherwise treated differently from other information. Timely news subjects not suitable for Wikipedia may be suitable for our sister project [[n:Main page|Wikinews]]. Wikipedia is also not written in [[news style]].
# '''Who's who.''' {{anchor|NOTWHOSWHO|WHOSWHO}} Even when an event is notable, individuals involved in it may not be. Unless news coverage of an individual goes beyond the context of a single event, our coverage of that individual should be limited to the article about that event, [[WP:DUE|in proportion]] to their importance to the overall topic. (See [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]] for more details.)
# '''A diary.''' {{anchor|NOTDIARY|DIARY}} Even when an individual is notable, not all events they are involved in are. For example, news reporting about celebrities and sports figures can be very frequent and cover a lot of trivia, but using all these sources would lead to over-detailed articles that look like a diary. Not every match played or goal scored is significant enough to be included in the biography of a person. -->
===<span id="INFORMACIÓN">A Wikipedia non é unha colección indiscriminada de información</span>===
| |||