Wikipedia:O que a Wikipedia non é: Diferenzas entre revisións
Contido eliminado Contido engadido
Liña 77:
# '''Unha exposición completa de todos os posibles detalles.''' No canto diso, un artigo é un resumo de todo o coñecemento aceptado con respecto ao tema. Os datos verificables e referenciados deben ter un tamaño apropiado e axustado á súa relevancia.
===
{{Anchor|MANUAL}}
{{Atallo|WP:NON#MANUAL}}
A Wikipedia é unha referencia enciclopédica, non un manual de instrucións, unha guía ou un libro de texto. Os artigos da Wikipedia non
# '''Manuais de instrucións.''' Aínda que a Wikipedia contén descricións de xente, lugares e cousas, os artigos non deben ter un estilo de manual de instrucións, tutorial, guía de xogo, columna de consellos, guía lega, receita de cociña ou opinións e suxestións médicas ou legais. A descrición sobre cómo a xente fai algo ou utiliza algo é enciclopédica,
# '''Guías de viaxe.''' Un artigo sobre [[París]] debe mencionar puntos destacados, como poden ser a [[Torre Eiffel]] e mais o [[Museo do Louvre]], pero non o número de teléfono ou a rúa dun hotel ou o prezo actual dun ''café au lait'' nos [[Avenida dos Campos Elisios|Campos Elisios]]. A Wikipedia non é o sitio axeitado para pór os contidos que irían nunha guía culinaria ou nun documental ou unha reportaxe sobre a cidade.
# '''Guías da internet.''' Os artigos da Wikipedia non deben existir soamente para describir a natureza, o aspecto ou os servizos que unha páxina web ofrece, senón que deben dar detalles sobre os logros da devandita web ou o seu impacto ou significancia histórica.
Liña 86 ⟶ 87:
# '''Xornais científicos.''' Unha artigo da Wikipedia non pode presentarse dando por suposto que o lector coñece de que vai o asunto. A lingua da introdución e as primeiras seccións do artigo debe empregar termos sinxelos e dar conceptos que calquera sen coñecementos no campo poida saber. Logo xa se poderá afondar en explicacións máis detalladas, tendo en conta que as ligazóns internas achegan información máis avanzada. Non obstante, a redacción dos artigos débese facer supoñendo que o lector non vai ou non pode seguir estas ligazóns, para non desviar a lectura do texto principal.
# '''Linguaxe académica.''' Os textos deben estar escritos para calquera tipo de lector, non para académicos. Os títulos dos artigos deben reflectir [[Wikipedia:Convencións dos nomes dos artigos|usos comúns]], evitando terminoloxías académicas, agás cando non sexa posible.
<!--
# '''Travel guides.''' An article on [[Paris]] should mention landmarks, such as the [[Eiffel Tower]] and the [[Louvre]], but not the telephone number or street address of the [[WP:POV|"best"]] restaurants, nor the current price of a ''café au lait'' on the [[Champs-Élysées]]. Wikipedia is not the place to recreate content more suited to entries in hotel or culinary guides, travelogues, and the like. Notable locations may meet the inclusion criteria, but the resulting articles need not include every tourist attraction, restaurant, hotel or venue, etc. While travel guides for a city will often mention distant attractions, a Wikipedia article for a city should only list those that are actually in the city. If you ''do'' wish to help write a travel guide, your contributions would be welcome at our sister project, [[Wikivoyage]].
# '''Video game guides.''' An article about a [[video game]] should summarize the main actions the player does in the game. But avoid lists of gameplay weapons, items, or concepts, unless these are notable as discussed in secondary sources in their own right in gaming context (such as the [[BFG9000]] from the [[Doom (series)|''Doom'' series]]). Walk-throughs or detailed coverage of specific point values, achievements, time-limits, levels, types of enemies, character moves, character weight classes, and so on are also considered inappropriate. A concise summary is appropriate if it is essential to understanding the game or its significance in the industry. See [[WP:VGSCOPE]].
# '''Internet guides.''' Wikipedia articles should not exist '''''only''''' to describe the nature, appearance or services a website offers, but should also describe the site in an ''encyclopedic manner'', offering detail on a website's achievements, impact or historical significance, which can be kept significantly more up-to-date than most reference sources, since editors can incorporate new developments and facts as they are made known. See the [[Portal:Current events|Current events portal]] for examples.
# '''FAQs.''' Wikipedia articles should not list [[FAQ|frequently asked questions]] (FAQs). Instead, format the information as neutral prose within the appropriate article(s).
# '''Textbooks and annotated texts.''' Wikipedia is an encyclopedic reference, not a textbook. The purpose of Wikipedia is to present facts, not to teach subject matter. It is not appropriate to create or edit articles that read as textbooks, with leading questions and systematic problem solutions as examples. These belong on our sister projects, such as [[Wikibooks]], [[Wikisource]], and [[Wikiversity]]. Some kinds of examples, specifically those intended to ''inform'' rather than to ''instruct'', may be appropriate for inclusion in a Wikipedia article.
# '''Scientific journals and research papers.''' A Wikipedia article should not be presented on the assumption that the reader is well-versed in the topic's field. Introductory language in the [[WP:LEAD|lead]] (and also maybe the initial sections) of the article should be written in plain terms and concepts that can be understood by any literate reader of Wikipedia without any knowledge in the given field before advancing to more detailed explanations of the topic. While [[WP:LINK|wikilinks]] should be provided for advanced terms and concepts in that field, articles should be written on the assumption that the reader will not or cannot follow these links, instead attempting to infer their meaning from the text.
# '''Academic language.''' Texts should be written for everyday readers, not just for academics. Article titles should reflect [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names)|common usage]], not academic terminology, whenever possible.
# '''Case studies.''' Many topics are based on the relationship of ''factor X'' to ''factor Y'', resulting in one or more full articles. For example, this could refer to ''situation X'' in ''location Y'', or ''version X'' of ''item Y''. This is perfectly acceptable when the two variables put together represent some culturally significant phenomenon or some otherwise notable interest. Often, separate articles are needed for a subject within a range of different countries, due to substantial differences across international borders; articles such as "[[Slate industry in Wales]]" and "[[Island fox]]" are fitting examples. Writing about "'''oak trees in North Carolina'''" or "'''blue trucks'''", however, would likely constitute a [[WP:POVFORK|POV fork]] or [[WP:OR|original research]], and would certainly not result in an encyclopedic article. -->
===<span id="BÓLA">A Wikipedia non é unha bóla de cristal</span>===
| |||